Questions About The Polyoma Vaccine
by Joel Blumberg, DVM, Santa Rosa Veterinary Hospital
This article is reprinted from Issue #37 of The
Pet Bird Report and may not be reprinted without the written permission
of the author, Sally Blanchard or the PBIC, Inc. Illustration by Jeff Riebe.
A Hornet’s Nest
This
one question can stir up a hornet's nest of opinions among any group
having an interest in parrots - breeders, retailers, veterinarians, pet
owners, even the birds themselves. Within the space limitations of this
column I'll try to give a fair digest of the arguments for and against
the use of the polyoma vaccine from the perspective of each of the
affected groups. I do feel qualified to enter the fray since I breed
parrots. I have worked with several reputable retailers, as well as
doing our own retailing at Bird Calls Parrot Farm. I am an avian
veterinarian and a devoted (demented?) pet bird owner. Last, but far
from least, our own birds are always willing to provide plenty of input.
First, let's go over the stuff that almost everyone
can agree on. (I gotta say "almost" because you can always find someone
who will disagree about something.)
-
The polyoma virus is out there big time. Polyoma virus infection has
been discovered in over 70 species of pet psittacines. The virus has
also been detected in finches, canaries, soft bills, doves,
chickens, pigeons, turkeys, and pheasants. It is seen all over the
world. Published reports have put the level of infection in the
average large parrot collection in the United States at 30%. The
level of infection among American budgerigars is estimated to be
70%. Recent studies point to cockatiels as having a very high
infection rate also.
-
Different species of birds can vary in their susceptibility to
polyoma virus infection. For example, English budgerigars seem to be
much more resistant than their American cousins.
-
There appear to be differences between species in regard to
mortality rate. For example, Polyoma disease has been reported to be
more deadly in American budgerigars, caiques, and eclectus. Species
which seem more likely to escape the worst effects of polyoma
disease are African greys, amazons, and lories.
-
There are species differences in duration of subclinical disease
(disease that is not outwardly apparent, but is damaging to the bird
internally).
-
Species differ in the likelihood of becoming a "carrier," which
sheds the virus into the environment. It looks like the very worst
offenders for shedding the virus after becoming infected are
American budgies and cockatiels.
-
Although there are species differences in response to polyoma virus
exposure, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PREDICT HOW ANY INDIVIDUAL BIRD WILL
REACT TO THE VIRUS. Here is a list of possibilities:
- Death with No warning. No preceding illness. No nothing. The
virus is so virulent to this particular victim that the bird dies
before there is any outward indication that something is wrong.
Sudden death most often occurs in recently hatched babies.
However, peracute deaths can occur at any age, including adults.
- Illness first, death later. Some poor souls suffer the effects
of polyoma disease before succumbing. They may have kidney damage
and pass blood in the urine. Eclectus appear to be particularly
prone to this form of the disease. Others may have
gastrointestinal signs, such as regurgitation, slow crop emptying,
and stunted growth. Hemorrhaging throughout the body is especially
common in babies. Neurological disease will appear as seizures,
loss of coordination, weakness, or mental lethargy. Finally, the
virus overwhelms its victim and the bird dies. This pattern of
polyoma disease usually occurs in youngsters, but some adults are
also affected this way. During most of the time that these birds
are sick, they will shed large amounts of virulent virus into the
environment.
- Illness, then recovery. Most adult birds, and even some
youngsters, will become infected and be sick only for awhile and
then recover completely. The signs of disease may be more subtle
in these birds, i.e. poor appetite, regurgitation, listlessness.
Breeders may not produce eggs for a season, eggs may be infertile,
or their chicks may die in shell or be very weak. Most birds
transiently ill from polyoma virus are never recognized as having
the disease. These birds also shed virus into the environment
before they recover.
- Persistent infection. Some birds remain infected with polyoma
virus for a very long time - months, years, some possibly forever.
These individuals may or may not show signs of illness. They may
suffer from other ailments because the polyoma virus has damaged
their immune system. Unless the test for polyoma virus is
performed, these birds go undetected. These "carrier" birds
intermittently release virus into the environment for as long as
they remain infected.
It is important to emphasize again - If your bird,
or any bird, is exposed to polyoma virus, there is no way to predict
how severely or in which manner it will react.
-
The polyoma vaccine is safe. The only reactions that I have
encountered over the past two years giving polyoma vaccinations have
been an occasional discoloration or thickening of the skin at the
injection site. Using the correct procedure, the vaccine must be
cleanly administered under the skin.
-
The polyoma vaccine is effective. Extensive testing under controlled
laboratory conditions, as well as in numerous field trials, have
shown that approximately 95% of all birds vaccinated will produce an
immune response to the vaccine.
To Vaccinate ... Or Not?
OK, now that I've outlined the areas that everyone
(almost) can agree on, let me delve into the controversial side of the
discussion - to vaccinate or not to vaccinate.
First let me put on my BREEDER'S hat. (It's
camouflage colored and highly textured.) Let's get right down to the
nitty gritty with us breeders - we need to make money! I won't go into a
long lament, but ask any bird breeder - it ain’t exactly lucrative. In
fact, for a lot of us, covering costs would be rather nice. Hardly
anyone is giving up their day job. From a breeder's point of view, the
polyoma vaccine is expensive. The wholesale price is five times the cost
for the common dog and cat vaccines, and these cover several diseases,
not just one! Except for a few huge commercial aviaries, the
manufacturer will not sell to individual aviculturists. Therefore, the
only source of vaccine for most breeders is their avian veterinarian.
Because proper vaccination technique is so important to the safety and
effectiveness of the vaccine, all but a very few breeders have their
veterinarian administer the vaccinations. This gets expensive when there
are dozens or hundreds of birds involved. Now, it's true that when a
flock is vaccinated, polyoma related problems (poor productivity,
secondary infections, "normal" losses, etc.) will decrease and
productivity and profitability will increase. However, the expense
occurs in big chunks at vaccination time, while the rewards occur over
the long haul — months and years. So, when an aviculturist has to decide
how to allocate his or her limited funds, it is understandable that
repairs, updated equipment, improved husbandry, and better diets get the
financial attention. The only way around this dilemma is for buyers of
parrots, at all levels, to demand and be willing to pay for vaccinated
birds. It certainly isn't fair to expect breeders to cut into a
nonexistent profit margin in order for buyers to obtain a superior
product.
Another reason a breeder may object to vaccinating
his or her birds is the amount of disturbance it causes within the
aviary. There are some breeding birds that have never been handled since
being placed in their cages years ago. The concern is that birds can be
so upset by having their routine interrupted that they will injure
themselves, injure their mates, or stop their normal parenting
activities. These concerns are valid, but they can be greatly minimized
by vaccinating during the non-breeding season and by utilizing quiet
competent personnel. An important plus to aviculturists who are
vaccinating is the opportunity to examine their birds closely, in many
cases for the first time in years. Problems can then be discovered and
corrected.
Some breeders decline to vaccinate for polyoma
because they claim that there is not a problem in their aviary, so why
go to the expense and bother? They may be absolutely correct. If every
bird in the aviary was tested negative with the new DNA-based blood
test, the facility is operated by the strict "closed aviary concept,"
and periodic monitoring for polyoma is performed, I would agree that it
would be very unlikely for polyoma virus to ever be a problem in such an
aviary. However, the vast majority of aviaries are not operated this
stringently. As mentioned earlier, in the average aviary, approximately
one-third of the population will have evidence of exposure to polyoma
virus. Remember, the effects of this virus can be subtle or erratic, so,
unless a breeder is looking for it, polyoma may go unrecognized — or
accepted and ignored.
The Retail Perspective
The RETAIL PERSPECTIVE on this issue is probably the
most complex. By their very nature, strict disease control in even the
best pet shops is impossible. Birds, along with their germs, are coming
and going constantly. Most retailers obtain their birds from many
sources which can vary from hobbyists and modest aviculturists to
wholesalers and huge commercial "birdy mills." Some birds may be sold on
consignment from individuals who no longer want their birds for a whole
variety of reasons. These sources are usually changing constantly. In
most cases the retailer has no knowledge nor control (and sometimes no
interest) over the production and husbandry practices of his or her
suppliers. Birds from these different backgrounds are then kept in close
proximity, sharing the same air space, sometimes even the same
enclosures. During their passage through the retail outlet there can be
a constantly changing population and mixing of birds. All of these birds
are unavoidably being stressed by several factors: shipping, changing
environment, changing diet, perhaps weaning, growth, new people, etc. As
we discussed in previous columns, stress greatly impairs an individual's
immune system.
Next, the poor retailer has to contend with people.
Now, don't get me wrong, it's not that people are bad. In fact, people
are pretty darn crucial to a retailer. After all, it's people who plunk
down the moolah for all the stuff that's for sale and enables the
retailer to make the car payments and send the kids to camp. It's people
who deliver all those animals and products. It's people who make up the
staff. However, people can also be a major source of germs to the pet
shop animals - especially the birds. A customer may have handled a sick
bird at another place (or his or her own home!) just before coming in. A
supplier can bring germs in from previous stops. The products themselves
may be contaminated if they were grown, processed, collected,
manufactured, packaged, housed, shipped, or handled by personnel where
there is exposure to birds. And staff? They are animal-lovers. They own
animals. They have friends with animals. They do stuff and go places
where there are lots of animals - and animal germs. People, who are the
lifeblood of any retail business, can be as significant a source of
germs in a pet shop as the animals.
Now, I'm not aware of any studies into the psyche of
microbes, but I just betcha that at some level they have emotions. And,
if they do, they would be totally ecstatic to encounter a population of
high stress potential victims. Having the opportunity to infect so many
individuals whose immune defenses are down is entering germ paradise,
fulfilling a microorganism's greatest fantasy. It is a known fact that
happy germs are very democratic. They are more than willing to share the
wealth. An infection caused by one disease agent can make it easier for
the next one to gain access to the victim. The polyoma virus can be an
eager and major participant in the germ-happy scenario. Horror stories
abound about polyoma virus outbreaks in retail establishments.
So, am I saying that any disease control is
impossible in a pet shop? Absolutely not! What I am saying is that,
despite the fact that there are inherent difficulties which make perfect
control impossible, there are a great many ways for pet shops to
minimize the risk of disease in their animals. There are some excellent
courses and programs available to pet shop personnel aimed specifically
to train them on how to provide for the health and well-being of pet
shop "livestock." There are excellent retail establishments which make a
tremendous effort to provide healthy birds and are always looking for
ways to improve their situation.
Polyoma vaccination is an important component of a
pet shop health program. Ideally, birds should be fully protected prior
to entering the retail facility. However, there is still some benefit to
vaccinating birds already in the store. I won't go into the technical
details of how to establish a health plan which incorporates protection
against polyoma virus. Such programs do now exist and have been adopted
by progressive retailers. Quality health programs and polyoma
vaccination add to the overhead costs of these conscientious
establishments, which is reflected in higher prices for their birds. It
is up to all of us bird people to demand quality from retailers and to
enthusiastically support those which provide it!
The Veterinary Viewpoint
When it comes to the VETERINARY VIEWPOINT on polyoma
vaccination, I can really get going - and often do, to the dismay of my
staff, who try valiantly (and with limited success) to keep me on
schedule. I'll try very hard to confine my remarks here to under book
length. (I'm sure Sally's red pen will be a big help!)
For many years the veterinary profession was strongly
criticized by the owners and breeders of pet birds for not providing the
same level of medical care as was available to other domestic species.
The criticism was truly justified. Pet bird medicine and surgery was
virtually an unknown entity in the veterinary school curricula. Finding
a pet hospital that would even see a bird was a very iffy proposition.
What little we did with pet birds was an attempt to combine what we
learned in our poultry medicine classes in vet school with our cat and
dog knowledge and techniques. By today's standards, the results were
pretty mediocre. Understandably there were a lot of disgruntled pet bird
owners.
In the 1980's the popularity of pet birds began its
meteoric rise, which continues today. Importation increased dramatically
and so did avian diseases. We all know the horror stories associated
with indiscriminate gathering, brokering, shipping, and confining of
birds in quarantine stations. In an attempt to control some of the worst
of the diseases that came out of those places, some vaccines were
developed. In the vast majority of cases the vaccines worked and
thousands of birds were protected. Unfortunately, there were also some
vaccine reactions. Some birds got very lethargic, lost their appetites,
and dropped weight. Other birds got severe reactions at the vaccine site
and had to have surgery to remove damaged tissue. A very small fraction
of vaccinated birds died.
I've got to emphasize that the problems associated
with these early vaccines were very few and that the vast majority of
vaccinated birds achieved disease protection smoothly. However, this
fact was no comfort to the bird owner whose pets or breeders were among
those which reacted adversely. As is natural with all of us human
animals, bad news makes for a good story. The recounting of unfortunate
experiences with the vaccines was passed from person to person with
great enthusiasm. Of course, with each repetition the number and
severity of the problems would grow and grow. This phenomenon occurred
throughout the avicultural community as well as among veterinarians. The
legacy of our early halting attempts to practice pet bird medicine, and
the stories that came out of our past efforts to vaccinate pet birds,
was the creation of a real phobia, bordering on hostility, toward the
very concept of pet bird vaccination. These negative attitudes have
carried over to the present time, especially among "old time" breeders
and even among some of my colleagues.
However, all that I've described above is history.
Today the situation is significantly different in so many ways.
Veterinary schools now offer advanced degrees in avian medicine and
surgery. Extremely important advanced research is being conducted in
dozens of institutions. The keeping and breeding of the pet bird species
is so prevalent now that even the commercial sector is investing in and
developing avian products, therapeutics, and specialized equipment. The
Association of Avian Veterinarians is more active than ever in
promoting, coordinating, and disseminating this burgeoning knowledge to
avian veterinarians throughout the world. In other words we're finally
doing it right! Avian medicine is getting the kind of attention and
support that triggered so many breakthroughs in other areas of
veterinary medicine.
In my humble opinion, the current polyoma vaccine
ranks right up there as a major breakthrough. It is every bit as
significant as parvovirus and distemper vaccines in dogs or leukemia and
distemper vaccines in cats. My practice saw one case of canine distemper
two years ago. I can't remember our last case of feline distemper. In
the "old days" we encountered these diseases weekly! The only reason for
the dramatic decline in the incidence of these devastating diseases is
vaccination, widespread continuous vaccination.
Polyoma today is like distemper of twenty years ago.
With the new tests available I am encountering it nearly as often as I
used to diagnose distemper. This doesn't have to be the case. The
polyoma vaccine gives us the weapon to reduce the incidence of this
disease to an insignificant level comparable to distemper. Therefore,
when I consider how serious polyoma virus is in our domestic parrot
population, philosophically and morally I feel bound to recommend mass
vaccination of all captive psittacines.
Now, don't get me wrong. I don't claim that polyoma
vaccination is going to solve all health problems in parrots. It is no
substitute for sound husbandry practices in aviaries, strict sanitation
in pet shops, or balanced diet and loving care in our homes. All the
polyoma vaccine will do is protect against polyoma virus infection.
That's more than enough reason for me to recommend it. If we truly love
birds as we claim (You wouldn't be reading the Pet Bird Report if you
didn't. Right?), we all have to be willing to pay for it - which
ultimately means the buyer. Anytime any of us in any area of the parrot
world purchases a bird, we must insist upon, and be willing to pay for
the cost of that bird being protected against polyoma virus.
As An Individual Pet Owner?
For us INDIVIDUAL PET BIRD OWNERS, the decision to
vaccinate is based upon the opportunities for the polyoma virus and our
bird(s) to get together. If there is absolutely no way for the virus to
meet up with a bird, then vaccination is unnecessary. However, consider
the possible routes polyoma virus can take to enter a bird's
environment:
- One of your other birds is already infected and you don't know it.
- Birds visit the groomer.
- Birds are boarded.
- Birds accompany owner to pet shops, bird marts, feed stores, bird
clubs.
- Birds visit their veterinarian. (Gulp! I gotta admit that our
super-duper best disinfectants and air purifiers can't get the risk to
absolute zero.)
- Owner goes to pet shop, bird mart, feed store, bird club, or
veterinarian - and doesn't shower and change clothes immediately upon
returning home.
- Cages, toys, food, perches, at some point in their existence,
share the same air space with unprotected birds.
- Bird visits homes housing unprotected birds.
- Unprotected bird(s) visit your home.
- Owner visits homes housing unprotected birds.
- Owners of unprotected birds enter your home.
- Cages, perches, or birds brought outdoors with direct or indirect
exposure to native species — a big question mark. Polyoma virus
definitely infects finches. It has been isolated from a number of
soft-bill and waterfowl species.
If you or your bird will encounter any of the above
situations any time in the next year, then polyoma vaccination will
provide peace of mind that you have protected your feathered pets as
much as you can.
If a trip to your avian veterinarian is difficult for
you because of logistics or the emotional effect it has on your bird,
discuss these concerns with your veterinarian. He or she encounters
these problems routinely and can offer useful suggestions. Perhaps a
home visit can be arranged.
If financial considerations are involved — I want to
be diplomatic here; I don't want to be accused of drumming up business
for my fellow avian vets or being insensitive to individual economic
situations, but, talking now as an advocate of pet birds, the price of
vaccination should be budgeted into the costs required to provide the
normal care for any pet. The cost of vaccinating a pet bird against
polyoma virus is comparable to the costs of the common dog and cat
vaccinations. When you consider how much we spend pampering our
feathered darlings with cages, toys, food, treats, playpens, recordings,
perches, etc., the amount spent on vaccination is not very much at all.
Vaccinating any animal is simply part of responsible pet ownership.
In conclusion, A WORD FROM THE BIRD is in order.
Magic, my African gray would like to speak on behalf of all her fellow
avians who keep people as pets—and servants. "Polyoma is no joke, and I
don't want our owners to jeopardize our health or lives by not getting
us vaccinated. Now, I know it's kinda scary to go to the doctor, and
being poked isn't something that I would choose to do every day, but,
actually the vaccine is no big deal ... but, don't let your owner know
this. If you play your cards right you can work on your owner's sympathy
after getting your vaccine. It should be good for at least a special
snack, maybe even a new toy. Do whatever it takes—be good, be bad, be
cute, be entertaining, be noisy, be quiet, be cuddly, but definitely be
insistent—have your owner get you protected against polyoma virus!"
IS POLYOMA VACCINATION NECESSARY? IT IS TO THE BIRD WHICH WILL BE
EXPOSED NEXT MONTH.
If
this article helped you and you appreciated the information, The
Companion Parrot Quarterly continues to have in-depth, practical
articles such as this one.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE